on 2006-03-08 06:01 pm (UTC)
I was also thinking that inverting the hierarchy, like you said, could maybe have something to do with matriarchical societies. But I don't really know much about matriarchical societies, so I'll have to find more info.

Thing is, there's absolutely zero evidence that matriarchal societies ever existed. Well, there's no conclusive evidence, anyway. Early proponents of the theory, led by Marija Gimbutas, interpreted archaeological evidence in a way that suited a theory they were already trying to prove; but the thing is, that evidence is scant and lacks context, and could mean any number of things. Also, their research focused entirely on Europe, and fails to explain why the rest of the world is patriarchally organized (the theory is that some patriarchal race from the Russian Steppes conquered the matriarchies of Europe, but the theory doesn't say anything about Asia, the Americas, etc.)

Given the patriarchal organization of primate societies, and given that men pretty much run things now, I'd say one needs more than some female-shaped statuettes and a warm fuzzy feeling to assert that things were any different between the emergence of hominids and the beginning of recorded history.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

March 2020

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29 3031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 01:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios